|
|
Continuum,
Multiple Sclerosis, October 2007,
Volume 13,
Issue 5
| Issue Overview |
| Key Points for Issue. (pdf) |
|
faculty.
(PDF only)
|
|
editor's preface.
- Miller, Aaron
|
|
diagnosis and differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
- Rinker, John, Cross, Anne
>
Show/Hide Abstract
Making the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) remains a challenging problem for clinicians. The foundation of diagnosis rests on demonstrating neurologic lesions, predominantly in the white matter, that are disseminated over space and time. Diagnostic criteria guide the clinician through applying clinical, radiologic, and laboratory evidence to secure the diagnosis. Complicating the process, however, is the existence of other conditions that may resemble MS and mislead the clinician to the wrong diagnosis. A familiarity with the differential diagnoses of symptoms commonly associated with MS permits the clinician to make the most accurate diagnosis.(C) 2007 American Academy of Neurology
|
|
pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.
- Rose, John, Carlson, Noel
>
Show/Hide Abstract
Significant progress toward understanding the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) has been achieved in recent years. Scientific and technologic advances are providing a foundation for further elucidation of MS pathogenesis. This review will focus on key findings related to cause, genetic susceptibility, immunopathogenesis, and neurodegeneration and repair in MS.(C) 2007 American Academy of Neurology
|
|
genetics and epidemiology of multiple sclerosis.
- Green, Ari, Waubant, Emmanuelle
>
Show/Hide Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex genetic disease. In addition to a modest heritability of risk, multifaceted gene-environment interactions play a role in causing disease. Although the exact mechanisms involved in MS pathogenesis remain unclear, both genetic and environmental factors have been implicated in susceptibility. It seems likely that both heritable and environmental factors also contribute to determine the clinical course of the disease. The challenge for MS research is to identify the primary genetic and environmental etiologic factors and to find ways to minimize their impact. Given the complexities involved, unraveling the relationships between these factors is extremely difficult and to date has had limited success.A role for heritability was suggested in the early descriptions of MS, even before the advent of modern genetics. Epidemiologic studies have provided us with a number of critical insights, including our awareness that the condition may be familial (1896), our appreciation of differences in gender-related and ethnic risks (1921), our understanding of the recurrence risk in families, and our description of the major histocompatibility complex class I and II associations. The evidence for the role of environmental factors in MS pathogenesis includes a higher prevalence of disease at higher latitudes, the apparent presence of clusters in some areas, and the absence of complete penetrance, even in monozygotic twins. The precise nature of the interplay between genetic and environmental factors is unknown.(C) 2007 American Academy of Neurology
|
|
advances in the neuropathology of multiple sclerosis: evolving pathogenic insights.
- Lucchinetti, Claudia
>
Show/Hide Abstract
The advent of more sophisticated histologic and molecular tools to study multiple sclerosis (MS) pathology has contributed to evolving concepts regarding disease initiation and progression. MS lesions display pathologic heterogeneity. It is uncertain whether these observations reflect heterogeneity of the disease or, alternatively, are stage-dependent with multiple mechanisms occurring over the course of disease. Remyelination is present in MS lesions and may be extensive. Apart from myelin and oligodendrocyte damage, axons are also injured in MS and are considered an important pathologic correlate of disability. In addition to axonal damage that occurs in the acute active MS plaque, a low-grade ongoing axonal injury occurs in the MS plaque, periplaque, and normal-appearing white matter. This begins early, accumulates, and likely contributes to disease progression. MS pathology is not restricted to the focal white matter lesion, but also includes diffuse cortical and white matter damage. The apparent dissociation between early inflammation and subsequent disease progression is a well-recognized feature of MS, termed the "inflammation-neurodegeneration paradox." This chapter will summarize new insights into the development and evolution of both focal and global tissue injury in MS.(C) 2007 American Academy of Neurology
|
|
magnetic resonance imaging of multiple sclerosis.
- Naismith, Robert, Cross, Anne
>
Show/Hide Abstract
MRI has revolutionized the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). In addition, use of MRI has provided a means to monitor disease and the response to therapy and has been used extensively as an adjunct means to evaluate new therapies. Despite its high sensitivity to detect MS lesions, its specificity for the underlying pathology is low. Furthermore, correlation of MS disability with the extent of abnormalities using several different methods of imaging has been modest at best. This chapter discusses the main imaging techniques used for MS diagnosis, MS management and treatment monitoring, and in clinical trials.(C) 2007 American Academy of Neurology
|
|
disease-modifying therapies.
- Mehta, Lahar, Goodman, Andrew
>
Show/Hide Abstract
The introduction of disease-modifying therapies has revolutionized the care of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Currently six agents have been specifically approved for use in MS. These include three formulations of interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, mitoxantrone, and natalizumab. Evidence supporting their use includes demonstrable impact on relapse rate, MRI measures of lesion activity and accumulation, as well as (in some cases) a favorable impact on disability progression.(C) 2007 American Academy of Neurology
|
|
symptomatic management of multiple sclerosis.
- Schwid, Steven
>
Show/Hide Abstract
Symptoms commonly caused by multiple sclerosis include weakness; spasticity; sensory disturbances; tremor; bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction; fatigue; affective symptoms; and cognitive impairment. For each of these symptoms, there are pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments that may help to ameliorate symptoms. Such treatments can improve day-to-day function and improve quality of life, making them important adjuncts to disease-modifying therapies.(C) 2007 American Academy of Neurology
|
|
ethical perspectives in neurology.
- Okuda, Darin
|
|
practice issues in neurology.
- Hosey, Jonathan
|
|
appendix a: american academy of neurology practice guidelines for multiple sclerosis.
(PDF only)
|
|
patient management problem.
- Schwid, Steven
|
|
index.
(PDF only)
|
|
Take Continuum Online CME for this issue
.
|
The AAN is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical
education (CME) for physicians.
The AAN designates this educational activity for a maximum of 10 American Medical Association (AMA) Physician Recognition Award
(PRA) Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only those hours of credit that they actually spend in the educational activity.
Per AMA PRA guidelines, only US and licensed international physicians may be awarded AMA PRA Category 1 Credit certificates. The
AAN will issue certificates of participation to non-MD/DO health professionals indicating that the activity was designated
for AMA PRA Category 1 Credit.
The American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology has reviewed
Continuum: Lifelong Learning in Neurology® and has approved the product as part of a
comprehensive lifelong learning program, which is mandated by the American Board of Medical Specialties
as a necessary component of maintenance of certification.
Andrea Weiss
Associate Publisher, AAN Enterprises, Inc.
Managing Editor, Continuum and Quintessentials
aweiss@aan.com
(651) 695-2742
|
|