Log In

Forgot Password?

OR

Not a member? Continue as a nonmember.

Become a Member

By becoming a member of the AAN, you can receive exclusive information to help you at every stage of your career. Benefits include:

Join Now See All Benefits

Loading... please wait

Abstract Details

Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Somatosensory Functional Mapping
Epilepsy/Clinical Neurophysiology (EEG)
S30 - Epilepsy/Clinical Neurophysiology (EEG): Technology (5:18 PM-5:30 PM)
010

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the “science and engineering of making intelligent machines.” Despite advances in AI and its transformative role in medicine, it is lagging in the field of epilepsy surgery. IcEEG data are an ideal medium for AI applications.

Using free-running intracranial EEG (icEEG) data, we compare the performance of machine learning algorithms with a binary electrocortical stimulation (ECS) outcome to map functional somatosensory (SM) and nonfunctional areas over the frontoparietal regions.

The study included consecutive cases with intractable epilepsy that underwent icEEG monitoring in a single center between 2013-2018, in which standard functional evaluation of the SM cortex was performed.  We evaluated the performance of support vector machines (SVMs), simple multilayer perceptron (MLP), bootstrap forests (BF), boosted trees (BT), decision trees (DT), and logistic regression (LR) to identify the SM cortex using previously validated characteristics from 6-10 minutes of resting icEEG data, applying standard common parameters, 10-fold cross-validation, and no expert supervision.  

Seven subjects and 376 contacts were identified. The median threshold for the SM mapping was 2.5 mA and a range of 1.5 to 7 mA. Function-to-other ratio: 1:2.35.  SM cortex showed higher EEG band power than non-SM cortex (medians normalized power 0.22 [IQR 0.11–0.93] vs 0.12 [IQR 0.08–0.24] P < 0.0002). The mean (maximum) AUC for MLP, SVM, BF, LR, BT and DT in classifying function versus the other was 87.4% (95.2%), 84.6% (89%), 84.1% (90.6%), 82% (93.8%), 81.7% (94.2%) and 80.13% (90.7%) respectively.

When analyzing binary SM functional classification without expert input, the performance of AI algorithms is comparable, with MLP then SVM consistently outperforming the others. Our findings suggest that future research and applications should emphasize clinical features and indications rather than algorithms. To translate our findings into clinical practice, experts should investigate new features, refine parameters within an algorithm, and conduct prospective validations.

Authors/Disclosures
Iktimal Alwan, MBBS
PRESENTER
Dr. Alwan has nothing to disclose.
Dennis Spencer, MD (Yale University School of Medicine) Dennis Spencer, MD has nothing to disclose.
Rafeed Alkawadri No disclosure on file